Site
Index:
Site Index / Menu.

Immigration:
Huge Impact on Racial Quotas, Preference and Welfare
Updated March 18, 2000

Back:
BACK:  MAIN News Links Index.
MAIN
News
Links
Index
INTRODUCTION:   An unprecedented number of immigrants are being allowed into the U.S. today.  As a group, immigrants tend to vote overwhelmingly in favor of race-based programs such as quotas, preferences and contracting set-asides.  Immigrants also tend to vote overwhelmingly Democratic!  Is our immigration policy simply a cynical vote-buying scheme by liberal Democrats?  Overall, is this cynical policy in our nation's economic interests?

[ General & Editorial ]           [ California's Prop. 187 ]


Illegal Immigrants to Receive Full Protection of U.S. EEOC (10/26/99)
          On Tue., Oct. 26, 1999 the controversial Latina head of the EEOC, Ida L. Castro, announced that the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission will henceforth protect illegal immigrants as if they were full U.S. citizens. 

          Ida Castro prefers to call them "victims of national origin discrimination", but the fact is that they are criminals under U.S. Immigration Law.  They don't pay taxes, they don't vote, they are here illegally, and they take jobs from U.S. citizens and from legal immigrants.   Furthermore, the EEOC will not, as a matter of policy, turn over these illegal immigrants to U.S. Immigration authorities.  (Several news links)
[link http://www.adversity.net/fed_stats/fednews_EEOC.htm#illegal_immigrants]

Immigration Is Fueling Poverty Rate (07/06/99)
          "Two new studies provide compelling evidence that, amid an unprecedented economic boom, U.S. immigration policy is fueling an increase in poverty in the U.S. Both the Urban Institute--a Washington-based think tank--and the federal General Accounting Office have found exceptionally high rates of welfare dependence and poverty among immigrants and newly naturalized citizens.

          "The GAO report found that newly naturalized citizens use public assistance programs in much greater numbers than the native born. ... In California, for instance, which is home to the greatest number of immigrants, 23.7% of newly naturalized citizens are receiving Medicaid benefits, compared with 8.2% of Californians as a whole. Nationally, the price tag for providing public assistance just to those who acquired U.S. citizenship during this period was $735 million.

          "This information alone should be enough to lead our government to question our immigration policy. But the GAO report raises another red flag that ought to be sounding alarm bells in Congress: The number of people who became citizens in the fiscal year 1996 was triple the previous peak in the naturalization rate. It also coincided with changes in federal welfare policy, which made noncitizens ineligible for many welfare programs. Thus, it is fair to surmise that the stampede to become American citizens was not a sudden outpouring of patriotism but rather motivated by immigrants' fear that they would lose their government subsidies. But is this a motivation that is really in the long-term interests of the nation?

          "Rising poverty attributable to our immigration policy and the apparent surge in naturalizations to retain eligibility for public assistance programs is a scenario that the late Barbara Jordan cautioned against in her report to Congress as chair of the U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform. Congresswoman Jordan, a Democrat from Texas, warned that our failure to control illegal immigration and the lack of skills-based admission criteria for most immigrants would inevitably lead to a new underclass in our society. She also stressed that becoming an American ought to be an expression of commitment on the part of immigrants to this country, not simply an affiliation of convenience.

          "It is simply irrational to maintain an immigration policy that is contributing mightily to the growth of poverty in our country and increasing the burdens on our social welfare programs, and doing so during a period of prosperity and nearly full employment."  (LA Times 07/06/99 by Dan Stein)
[link http://www.latimes.com/excite/990706/t000060520.html ]


Proposition 187:  Background and News

          California's Prop. 187 sought to deny illegal immigrants most taxpayer-funded public services.  Under former Republican Governor Pete Wilson's tenure, California voters overwhelmingly approved Prop. 187 in 1994 by 59% to 41%. 

          A federal judge tossed out the key provisions.  (The former governor, Republican) Pete Wilson appealed to the U.S. 9th Circuit, assuming the case ultimately would be decided by the Supreme Court.  The appeal was, of course, filed in Wilson's official capacity as Governor.

          When Democrat Gray Davis became Governor he inherited Wilson's 9th Circuit appeal -- in his official capacity as Governor.   The 9th Circuit wanted to know whether Davis wanted to proceed with Wilson's pro-187 court appeal, which still had not been resolved when Davis assumed office. 

          A strange situation for the Latino-loyalist, pro-minority Democratic governor to find himself in!  Especially since Latinos and immigrant groups had strongly supported Davis in the election.  

Proposition 187 Recent News:   Davis Allows Appeal to Expire; 187 is Dead.

A Messy Way to Settle Proposition 187 Dispute (07/30/99)
          "GOVERNOR DAVIS' mediated settlement on Proposition 187 is hardly going to mollify supporters of the 1994 anti-illegal immigration initiative. Nor will it completely mend the rift and hard feelings with Democrats and Latinos who wanted him to drop the appeal months ago. Davis, who opposed the voter initiative, yesterday announced that the state and civil rights groups agreed to end a legal battle over the measure. He said the agreement ``essentially embraces the spirit of Proposition 187.''

          "Some of the landmark measure's provisions denying state benefits, such as nonemergency health care, welfare and higher education, to undocumented immigrants will be supplanted by federal measures, he said."  (San Francisco Chronicle, Opinion, Page A24, 07/30/99)
[link http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/1999/07/30/ED83429.DTL ]

Prop. 187 mediation riles voters (07/30/99)
          Sub-head:  "Critics say the pact destroys faith in the initiative process."

          "The settlement that voids most of California's landmark anti-illegal-immigration initiative may bring a close to an era of ``divisive politics,'' but it may have a significant impact on voter confidence in the initiative process.

          "Even as supporters of Proposition 187 were looking for ways to legally attack the court-sanctioned mediation that scuttled the 1994 initiative, many voters were voicing disgust with the politically motivated mediation process. ``Don't ask me to vote anymore,'' an angry couple, Colleen and Jeff Nobil, wrote in an e-mail. ``It is a waste of my time to hurry from work, wait in line, place my vote and then have it ignored. This system has created apathy.''

          "That is exactly the reaction former Gov. Pete Wilson, who spearheaded Proposition 187, said he expected when his successor, Democrat Gray Davis, moved the case behind closed doors. ``The process has implications even beyond the importance of Prop. 187,'' said Wilson, who filed the appeal when a federal judge ruled most of the initiative unconstitutional. ``Whatever side you're on in an issue, it seems to me you ought to be afforded your day in court.''" (San Jose Mercury News 07/30/99 by Hallye Jordan and Howard Mintz)
[former link **http://www.sjmercury.com/premium/local/docs/immigrant30x.htm]

Davis Won't Appeal Prop. 187 Ruling, Ending Court Battles
          "Attorneys for Gov. Gray Davis and civil rights organizations have reached an agreement to end the litigation surrounding Proposition 187, effectively killing the landmark 1994 ballot referendum that targeted illegal immigrants and became a pivotal juncture in California's political life.

          "Davis has agreed not to appeal an earlier federal court ruling that held much of the initiative to be unconstitutional.  The agreement, which is expected to be filed today with the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, almost certainly will prevent the case from going to the U.S. Supreme Court, said lawyers on both sides of the case.

          "Proposition 187, approved by nearly 60% of California voters, became a national symbol of anger about illegal immigration.  Court battles, however, blocked most of its provisions from being enforced.  The deal seems sure to ignite additional controversy, since it permanently bars the enactment of the ballot measure's core provisions--those preventing illegal immigrants from attending public schools and receiving social services and subsidized health care, according to the lawyers."
[link http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/STATE/t000067492.html ]

Davis to drop Prop. 187 appeal (dead link)
          "Gov. Gray Davis plans to abandon the state's defense of Proposition 187, killing most of the divisive landmark anti-illegal-immigrant measure.

          "The decision, which Davis is expected to announce today, reverses his earlier stance that as governor he was obligated to appeal a court ruling declaring unconstitutional the controversial 1994 voter-approved initiative. Davis had opposed the measure and also had promised during his campaign to end wedge-issue politics. Some of the state's most prominent Latino politicians, including Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante, had urged Davis to drop the appeal months ago and criticized him bitterly when he decided to ask the federal appeals court to mediate a settlement with the proposition's opponents."
[former link **http://www.sjmercury.com/premium/local/docs/prop18729.htm]

Anti-Immigrant Law Left With Little to Enforce
          "Gov. Gray Davis and opponents of Proposition 187 will announce an agreement today that all but ends the legal challenges to a 1994 voter-approved initiative that barred education and other government services for illegal immigrants. All that will be left of the measure that provoked a political firestorm among immigrants will be a state law that outlaws manufacture and use of false documents to conceal illegal immigration status.

          "The announcement will be made at separate press conferences this morning in Los Angeles by the Democratic governor and lawyers representing opponents of the ballot measure."
[link http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/1999/07/29/MN90684.DTL ]

Deal struck to end litigation over immigrant aid
          "Gov. Gray Davis has struck a deal with civil rights organizations, nullifying the major provisions of a controversial ballot measure that sought to limit services to illegal immigrants. Davis agreed not to appeal a federal court ruling that held much of the voter-approved initiative Proposition 187 to be unconstitutional, Davis' spokesman Michael Bustamante said today. The deal was expected to be approved today by the U.S. 9th

          "Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco. Proposition 187 was endorsed by 60 percent of California voters in 1994, but most of its provisions have gone unenforced due to court challenges. Davis opposed the measure but had to decide whether to defend it in court after becoming governor. He said previously he had no intention of enforcing that part of the proposition denying education to undocumented schoolchildren."
[link http://www.sacbee.com/news/calreport/calrep_story.cgi?N35.HTML ]


END Immigration


Use the BACK button in your browser to return to your originating page.

Immigration Main Page

Importing Foreign High Tech Workers

ALL THE NEWS Index

 

Top:
Go to Top of Page
MAIN NEWS
Index

by category
DONATE
Contributions are tax-deductible
HORROR
STORIES

and case studies
TERMS
and Definitions
SEARCH
Site
LEGAL HELP
Firms and Resources
LINKS MESSAGE
Board
GO:  Home Page
Home
Page Index
URL's and page names for site
Favorite
EDITORIALS

National opinion
DIRTY RACIAL
POLITICS

How Quotas are Enforced
EDITOR'S DESK
What's Hot!
RACIAL
PROFILING

D.O.J. Requires It!
EDUCATIONAL
TESTING

News Analysis
CENSUS 2000
Racism
ABOUT US

Copyright 2002 Adversity.Net, Inc., an IRS 501(c)(3) tax-exempt educational organization.  For problems or questions regarding this web contact editor@adversity.net    Last updated: March 18, 2000.

Go to Adversity.Net Home Page

*  We use the term reverse discrimination reluctantly and only because it is so widely understood.  In our opinion there really is only one kind of discrimination.