Site
Index:
Site Index / Menu.

Books about Racial Quotas
Use the BACK button in your browser to return to originating page.

Back:
BACK:  More Links, More News Index.
More
Links
and
News
Index

A Collection of Reviews and Titles

Hating Whitey and Other Progressive Causes (Sept. 1999)
By David Horowitz (Spence Pub; ISBN: 189062621X) Available in hardcover from Amazon.Com for $24.95

          "The title reflects a major theme of the book, the 'anti-white racism' that Mr. Horowitz says has 'become a common currency of the 'progressive' intelligentsia.'

          "'Whites are the only group that there's a license to hate in America today, says Mr. Horowitz.  'I wanted people to be confronted by their hypocrisy.'

          "'The point of 'Hating Whitey' is that 'ideological hatred of whites is now an expanding industry,' embracing not only the anti-white rhetoric of black 'racist demagogues like Louis Farrakhan,' Mr. Horowitz writes, 'but also white liberals, such as Harvard lecturer Noel Ignatiev, who has proclaimed the need to 'abolish the white race by any means necessary.'

          "White liberals help incite this hatred, Mr. Horowitz says, giving as an example the eagerness of politicians such as first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton and Democratic presidential hopeful Bill Bradley to 'go kiss the ring of [New York black activist] Al Sharpton, a foul-mouthed racist.'" (From the Washington Times 10/08/99 page A2 by Robert Stacy McCain.)

          According to a review published on Amazon.Com, "Despite the intrusiveness of his ego, Horowitz writes engagingly about contentious issues, particularly the politics of race. Specifically, he objects to the way in which blacks are given carte blanche to indulge in reverse racism, a tendency that Horowitz traces in part to affirmative action and the contemporary mania to stake out the role of the victim. In a highly polemical style, Horowitz argues that Americans, particularly black Americans, have lost sight of the color-blind society envisioned by Dr. King." (Quoted from review by Kirkus Associates, LP.)

          Also, read the introductory chapter of Hating Whitey, Introduction: Memories in Memphis by David Horowitz.
[link http://www.dhorowitz.com/intro.htm ]

Purchase "Hating Whitey" at the following links:
[visit Amazon.Com to purchase 'Hating Whitey' by David Horowitz]


A Dream Deferred:  The Second Betrayal of Black Freedom in America
By Shelby Steele (HarperCollins, 185 pages)
          "Shelby Steele's "A Dream Deferred" is essentially a harder-edged and more theoretical exploration of the ideas in his groundbreaking first book, "The Content of Our Character" (1990).

          "Steele's recurring theme has been to unmask the dubious motivations behind the race-conscious remedies embraced by white liberals and blacks. For Steele, '60s liberalism's "first and all-consuming goal was the expiation of American shame rather than the careful and true development of equity between the races."

          Steele shoots down all policies and attitudes that emphasize race.  Even affirmative race consciousness simply reverses and repeats the sins of racism, he argues: It locks whites into a position of guilty superiority (guilty, since their final redemption is forever withheld by power-mongering blacks; superior, since black uplift is made to depend on white largesse) and holds back blacks by forcing them to invest in their own victimization. It allows both races to avoid doing the hard work of actual uplift, which Steele insists can only come from the traditional American middle-class virtues: individual effort, education, self-improvement. (He points out that those areas where blacks have been most successful, such as music and athletics, are precisely those in which there are no interventions.)

          "... Steele, now a research fellow at Stanford University's conservative Hoover Institution, takes things one important step further in his new book:  He argues that all top-down social interventions that aim at moral improvement, not just race-conscious remedies, are destructive. "When redemptive liberals make interventions the agents of change over people, they avail themselves of one of the most popular formulas for power in the twentieth century," he writes, comparing America's embrace of redemptive racial politics to post-World War I Germany's embrace of Aryan supremacy and turn-of-the-century Russia's attempt to create a classless society."  (Review excerpted from Salon.Com)
[link http://www.salon.com/books/feature/1998/10/cov_19feature.html ]


Somebody Else's House: America's Unfinished Struggle for Integration
By Tamar Jacoby (The Free Press, 614 pages)

          "If Shelby Steel’s "A Dream Deferred" (above) is a theoretical attack on orthodox racial thinking, Tamar Jacoby's "Somebody Else's House" is resolutely historical. Jacoby, a former New York Times reporter who now works with the centrist Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, examines the racial history of three cities -- New York, Detroit and Atlanta -- in an attempt to find out why the high integrationist hopes of the civil rights movement were dashed. Her detailed history, based largely on newspaper and magazine accounts and extensive interviews, is an incisive, if dispiriting, portrait of the consequences of the collision of black militancy with white liberalism.

          "Jacoby draws different morals from each of the three cities she studies. New York in the idealistic Lindsay years, with its divisive fight over school decentralization, represents "a lesson in the limits of goodwill and sixties-style top-down engineering." Detroit, where bitter racial divisions, a long battle over busing and the combative posturing of Mayor Coleman Young all contributed to white flight and black rage, "is a study in the consequences of choosing against integration." And Atlanta, which despite apparent progress remains profoundly separated along racial lines, poses the question "Is real integration possible in America today?"

          "But if the lessons are different, the mistakes Jacoby believes were made were the same. The same pattern unfolds again and again: a failure of leadership, both by well-meaning but misguided whites and demagogic blacks. White leaders, anxious to achieve immediate racial progress in the wake of riots and widening racial tension, handed a blank check to the black community. But the only leaders who stepped forward were militants, who were often more interested in racial posturing and amassing racial spoils than in working together with whites to solve the black community's problems from the bottom up. These angry -- often conveniently angry -- exponents of Black Pride, Jacoby argues, didn't really represent the feelings of the majority of blacks, but their willingness to stand up to the white man made them attractive, especially since "constructive, gradualist leaders were in short supply." So the Al Sharptons and the Malcolm Xs knocked out the Bayard Rustins and Martin Luther Kings, and set-asides and busing were enshrined as morally untouchable policies.

          "When whites protested these [race-based] policies, they were accused of racism.  Imtimated and increasingly resentufl, they literally and figuratively withdrew, leaving -- in the case of Detroit -- the virtually all-black inner city to wither away.  Race relations, poisoned by mutual mistrust and irresponsible leaders, never recovered."  (Review excerpted from Salon.Com)
[link http://www.salon.com/books/feature/1998/10/cov_19feature2.html ]


The Shape of the River by former Princeton and Harvard presidents William G. Bowen and Derek Bok.  This newest and most seriously flawed defense of racial preferences in college admissions has been hailed (falsely) by The New York Times as "striking confirmation of the success of affirmative action." A host of similar op-eds and reviews have followed suit, praising the book both for its flawed scholarship and for its baseless defense of affirmative action.  It is no surprise that Bill Clinton's racial-quota enforcer, Bill Lann Lee, gave a public speech in Nov. 1998 unabashedly supporting the erroneous conclusions of this book.  Few reviewers, however, have actually subjected the book's claims or methodology to serious, critical examination.   The Center for Equal Opportunity provides a critical analysis of this book's mis-use of statistics at http://www.ceousa.org/bok.html

Related Stories and Links:
Another Bend in "The Shape of the River", by Stephen Thernstrom (dead link)
          "Note that all of these figures for blacks are averages that include those who would have been admitted under race-neutral standards. Throughout "The Shape of the River," the authors lump together black students with outstanding academic qualifications with those whose admission was the result of the big break given to non-Asian minority applicants. Alas, Bowen and Bok do not calculate the graduation rate for the latter group, but it was surely much lower than that for the former."  (Washington Post,
Monday, December 14, 1998; Page A23)
[formerly http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPlate/1998-12/14/013l-121498-idx.html]
Critique of 'Shape of the River' by Linda Chavez, President, Center for Equal Opportunity (dead link)
          "The central criticism, not mentioned by Mr. Glazer, is that it is unfair to individuals and wrong for a society to classify people and treat them differently according to skin color.) In any event, the Bowen and Bok book concedes that black students do much worse than white students who are admitted to highly selective colleges, averaging in the 23rd percentile for class rank. What saves the black students is that it is hard for anyone to flunk out once he or she gets in." (Washington Post, p. A28, 12/21/98)
[formerly http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPlate/1998-12/21/003l-122198-idx.html]

The Shape of the Potemkin Village by James C. Higgins 01/29/99
          "I cannot improve upon the summary of Derek Bok and William Bowen's The Shape of the River that author Thomas Sowell gave in a recent speech: "This book says that people who benefit from programs benefit from programs."

          "Bok and Bowen, respectively the former presidents of Harvard and Princeton, present a detailed and seemingly objective look at the effect of racial-preference programs at a group of elite colleges. Their aim is to establish that race preferences are a good thing because the preference programs administered at their universities (and similar institutions) have had many salutary effects for the minorities who were admitted.

          "But in doing so, they present a Potemkin village: Some of what they say is true about the effects of the preference programs at the 28 elite colleges and universities they study. But the overall misleading impression they leave is the product of a dexterous sleight of hand.

          "Spinning the facts -- Here is an example of Bok and Bowen at work: They dispute the observation by Sowell, as well as the one made in America in Black and White by authors Stephan and Abagail Thernstrom and others, that admitting one group of students based on lower standards will cause a lack of "fit." In other words, that those admitted on the lower standards would, in fact, be better off if they attended colleges where their skills resemble those of the majority."  (IntellectualCapital.Com, 01/29/99, by James C. Higgins)
[former link *http://www.intellectualcapital.com/bibliotech/rev2-012899.asp]


American in Black and White:  One Nation Indivisible, by Stephan Thernstrom and Abigail Thernstrom. Simon & Schuster, 639 pages, $30.

               This book represents a significant study by husband-and-wife team Stephan and Abigail Thernstrom. Both have previously written much on this subject, independently and jointly. Stephen is a history professor at Harvard, and Abigail is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute.

               The Thernstroms are strongly opposed to racial quotas, racial hiring goals, racial preferences and government race-based contracting set-asides. And they use their considerable intellects to gather accurate, current information to graphically illustrate why these programs don’t work.
               "Marshaling an impressive array of well-footnoted facts, poll data, and census statistics (they even have encouraging figures about how often blacks and whites dine together in each other's houses), the Thernstroms demonstrate that blacks made considerably more economic and political progress before affirmative action became wide-spread, in the late '60s and early '70s, than they've made since."
[ For the complete review by Scott Stossel, visit http://www.phx.com/archive/books/97/09/25/BLACK_AND_WHITE.html ]


The California Cauldron, by Wm. A.V. Clark (UCLA Professor)
          "In one disturbing section after another, Clark describes how California's cities and towns have been inundated by one of the greatest waves of immigration in human history and how no one--particularly the immigrants themselves--has been spared by the result. Some of Clark's statistics will seem familiar, but they bear repeating. Since 1980, 5 million foreign newcomers have arrived in California, joining the 25 million already here. The mix of newcomers is astounding, from Vietnamese to Ukrainians, and entire cities have switched their racial compositions in less than a generation.

          "Within California, startling differences emerge. Currently, for example, 41% of all California immigrants wind up in Los Angeles County. One ZIP Code in Glendale, 91205, has absorbed 16,000 immigrants since 1980, and another ZIP Code in San Francisco has absorbed 25,000. Meanwhile, the state's best-known ZIP Code in Beverly Hills, 90210, has absorbed very few.

          "All of this makes California the great exception when it comes to the costs and benefits of immigration, Clark writes. At the national level, he contends, new immigrants have probably produced a plus for the economy. But in Los Angeles County and other heavy-influx areas, they have produced a large deficit. The federal government, after all, receives the lion's share of revenue from immigrants through income taxes but pays only a small portion of their education and medical care costs."  (LA Times, 02/14/99, by Roberta A. Jones)
[former link *http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/METRO/t000014138.html]


The Color of Politics:  Race, Class, and the Mainsprings of American Politics, by Michael Goldfield. New Press, 400 pages, $19.95.

               "Michael Goldfield's The Color of Politics: Race, Class, and the Mainsprings of American Politics argues that the central feature of American political history in this century has been the ongoing -- and largely unsuccessful -- attempt to work out the unresolved contradictions of the Civil War and Reconstruction.

               "The Color of Politics is honorably motivated, unapologetically left-wing -- and a terrible muddle. Haphazard, repetitive, and at times clumsily written, the book is too densely theoretical to appeal to many nonacademics but too cursory to be of much use to academics. Goldfield, who is a professor of labor studies at Wayne State University, draws too many oversimplified parallels between the pre-Civil War era and today (likening black youth unemployment to slavery, for example, and the Rodney King beating to lynchings). And many of the explanations for white racism that Goldfield surveys are either over-familiar or unconvincing."
[ For the complete review by Scott Stossel, visit http://www.phx.com/archive/books/97/09/25/BLACK_AND_WHITE.html ]


The Diversity Hoax: Law Students Report from Berkeley, by David Wienir, Marc Berley [Paperback - 194 pages (April 1999) Foundation for Academic Standards & Tradition; ISBN: 0966994000]

          One reader wrote:  "How many Asians currently play in the NBA? Are they under-represented? If so, why is this tolerated, and what must WE do to remedy this grievous situation?"

          "These absurd questions are not so absurd, at least according to the Leftist PC-police who rule the roost at Boalt Hall (UC Berkeley’s prestigious law school). A straightforward, powerful, often-disturbing collection of essays by Boalt students, "The Diversity Hoax" questions the self-serving notions of "diversity," "minority," and "racism" from the ultra-liberal perspective. Readers lucky enough to pick up this volume are left with little doubt that far too many students--and far too many educators and administrators--at Boalt view any opinion or individual outside of their narrow view of "tolerance" with extreme intolerance.

          "Why does Boalt’s definition of "diversity" refer only to racial diversity? Why do Boalt professors and administrators turn a deaf ear and a blind eye in the face of blatant personal attacks on those who have the ‘audacity’ to express themselves from anything but a ultra-liberal perspective? Why is the eternal message of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. ignored by those who hold his words most sacred?"

[ for more reviews, or to purchase, visit:  http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ts/book-customer-reviews/
0966994000/qid=923690632/002-4813578-6490849
]


Naked Racial Preference: The Case Against Affirmative Action, by Carl Cohen Boston: Madison Books, 1995.

          "The current flow of complaints about reverse discrimination in employment contracts in itself provides substantial evidence that the bargaining process, notwithstanding its general fairness, cannot be depended upon in this sphere. "Voluntary" is an appealing word. But its use here suggests what is not true-that those who were injured by the racial instruments devised in the contract did themselves volunteer to carry the burden. Weber's sacrifice cannot plausibly be called "voluntary." This defense of "voluntary" racial instruments (even if unions were invariably sensitive to matters of individual right) avoids the key question of legitimate authority. At stake here are the rights of individuals to the most fundamental of democratic conditions-equal treatment under the law-and, moreover, their rights to that equal treatment as it bears upon the most suspect of all categorical distinctions, race..."
[ For the complete review, visit http://humanitas.ucsb.edu/projects/aa/docs/cohen.individ.html ]


White Male Applicant:  An Affirmative Action Expose, written and illustrated by William A. Whitaker. 

          "Everything you've ever wanted to know about affirmative action, but nobody wanted to provide. White Male Applicant explains how white males have become the invisible victims of liberal society's preferential programs."   Author Wm. Whitaker uses case studies and cartoon illustrations to expose very serious discrimination against white males in the name of diversity.
[ Published by Apropos Press, soft cover, 210 pages, 1996.  Available from Amazon.Com for $14.95
link at http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0964904101/qid=953307587/sr=1-3/002-1684119-8929864 ]


Use the BACK button in your browser to return to your originating page, or select another index:

NEWS Links Index

MASTER Links Index

LEGAL Help Links Color Blind LINKS

Main Site Index:

Top:
Go to Top of Page
MAIN NEWS
Index

by category
DONATE
Contributions are tax-deductible
HORROR
STORIES

and case studies
TERMS
and Definitions
SEARCH
Site
LEGAL HELP
Firms and Resources
LINKS MESSAGE
Board
GO:  Home Page
Home
Page Index
URL's and page names for site
Favorite
EDITORIALS

National opinion
DIRTY RACIAL
POLITICS

How Quotas are Enforced
EDITOR'S DESK
What's Hot!
RACIAL
PROFILING

D.O.J. Requires It!
EDUCATIONAL
TESTING

News Analysis
CENSUS 2000
Racism
ABOUT US

Copyright 2002 Adversity.Net, Inc., an IRS 501(c)(3) tax-exempt educational organization.  For problems or questions regarding this web contact editor@adversity.net    Last updated: July 14, 2000.

Go to Adversity.Net Home Page

*  We use the term reverse discrimination reluctantly and only because it is so widely understood.  In our opinion there really is only one kind of discrimination.